Surely this is the primary goal of any listed company? But how is it measured, when many companies are sceptical of measurement methodologies and the integrity and accuracy of the results? It is reasonable to hope that most M&As will result in an instant raising of the company’s share price, and that company boards, rightly or wrongly, will use this simple indicator as a measure of success. But is this rise simply a short term moment of excitement? Surely the long term impact is a more important measure of the potential and ultimate sustainability of the newly formed entity? Will the two sets of shareholders see the upside potential or wallow in confusion as the two brands come together. Harmony or conflict?
Will the new entity gain new market share or even market domination? Will it become the new leader in the market segment? Will your M&A master the science of 1 + 1 = 3 or, as happens in 80% of cases, fail its elementary maths lesson with 1 + 1 = less than 2, or even 1 + 1 = 0 and never graduate from branding university?
Will the post-merger period be a reactive minefield or proactive where synergies are aligned with the pre-merger planning? The path to successful integration requires two approaches – internal and external.
Are the two brands compatible? Will they operate in perfect harmony surrounded by a warm shareholder glow, or fight tooth and nail to protect their interests fuelled by employee and customer concerns? How much brand-related groundwork was commissioned before the M&A was seriously considered?
Internal
Will the newly formed rock band Culture Clash raise its collective voice? Are the two sets of employees compatible? Are they moulded by a strong allegiance to their present employer’s culture and about to feel deceived by the obligation to transition to a totally different or compromise one?
External
What are the marketplace perceptions of the M&A? What exactly have you told your shareholders and customers about all this? Will they believe your predictions of success and compatibility? Have you told them what the new brand model will be – one brand, two brands or new brand – and why?
- Will you adopt the brand of the acquirer, because it is the market leader and you want to consolidate its position and possibly remove the competition?
- Will you combine the two brands? Are they equals in regards to similar market presence, reach and brand equity? Or is it simply that you can’t decide which one?
- Is it preferable to adopt the formula a + b = c where a new combined entity with a new name and identity is born?
How will you fare in the transition? Will your organisational capabilities integrate? Will the employees, resources and brands do likewise?
Time to call in the branding/integration/compatibility coach.
Tony Heywood is a Sydney-based brand guidance counsellor, founder of Heywood Innovation in Sydney Australia with affiliates in Melbourne, Gold Coast, London, Singapore and Mumbai.
1 comment:
女傭調教 女生自衛 夫妻交換 大腿內側 夜未眠成 嘟嘟情人 嘟嘟圖片 同志色教 吉澤明步 台中夜店 台北夜店 台灣同志 台灣ki 出包王女 凹凸電影 凌虐俠女 免費女同 免費女傭 免費圖片 免費同志 免費動畫 免費黃色 免費貼影 免費色片 免費dv 免費線上 -qq美美 jp素人 h文小說 辣媽寫真 辣媽哺乳 黃色珍藏 麗的線上 貼圖片區 高雄夜店 視訊kk 西洋美女 電影線上 阿賓小說 阿賓色慾 蓬萊仙山 色片直播 美女自衛 美國色片 美美色網 線上收看 線上動畫 素人寫真 素人大全 短片線上
Post a Comment